DEVELOPMENT
& LEARNING

Why separate training from real work? Our interventions combine participatory workshops, co-development and psychoeducation.

This is what we think we already know
that prevents us from learning.

Claude Bernard

Our methodology

Development does not follow learning. It precedes it.

Less than 20% of training courses generate a measurable change in the position. Because you don't change by listening. You change by doing.

Constat

Memorize through experience

Classic Learning & Development is based on a reverse logic: training first, developing later. We saturate the learner with content (e-learning modules, seminars, training), hoping that he will transform this theoretical knowledge into operational skills once “back at the job”.

The result: catastrophic transfer rates (less than 20% according to studies), massive training budgets for minimal impact, and employees who accumulate certifications without developing their real power to act.

This approach ignores a fundamental principle of developmental psychology: You don't learn to act, you learn by acting. Competency development does not happen in the training room; it happens in real activity, in the face of contradictions, dilemmas, situations that resist. Learning is a consequence of development and not the other way around.

Actions

How do we do it

Where classical L&D saturates the learner with content in the hope of future change, UNREST intervenes on The here and now activity.
We combine organizational coaching tools (professional co-development, agile facilitation, collective intelligence) with the principles of the activity clinic: we transform your operational challenges into real development devices.

Concretely:Starting from reality : We do not start from an abstract competency framework, but from concrete situations that cause problems or generate discomfort. A manager who cannot reframe, a team that skates on its decisions, a leader who avoids conflicts; it is these tensions that constitute the material for development.

Creating spaces for professional controversy : Through co-development (CODEV), practice analysis groups or facilitation workshops, we create devices where professionals confront their ways of doing things, verbalize their dilemmas, test alternatives. It is in this controversy, between peers, between oneself and oneself, that the capacity for action develops.

Anchoring through experimentation : Development is not validated by a multiple choice question or a certificate, but by the effective implementation of new professional actions. We prescribe intersessional tasks, micro-experiments to be deployed in a real situation, then we debrief them collectively. Development is anchored because it is tested, adjusted, reworked.

Expanding the repertoire of action : The objective is not to format behaviors, but to expand the repertoire of possible responses to situations. A manager develops his power to act when he can choose between several reframing styles depending on the context; not when he mechanically applies “THE” method learned in training.

Impact

What we give you back

Development leads to learning, not the other way around.When a manager experiences a new way of feedback in a real situation, debriefs with his peers, adjusts his practice, and observes the effect produced; then he is learning. But this learning is not disconnected from action: it is integrated by experience, validated by reality, rooted in the professional gesture.

You no longer remember content. You develop the ability to adapt in real time.

Concrete results:
- Your teams do not “return to the job” after training; they are already in the business, and it is this activity that becomes formative.
- Learning is not lost due to lack of transfer; it is directly rooted in daily practices.
- Development is no longer a one-off event (the seminar, the training) but a continuous process, supported by the systems we install (recurrent CODEV, communities of practice, analysis groups).

You are not training your employees to change tomorrow. You are developing their power to take action today.

Our difference

Why call on us?

UNREST is a cognitive-behavioral change firm. It is based on a resolutely scientific, structured and demanding approach to individual and collective change.

We only use research instruments
Our assessment and development solutions are entirely based on the latest tools and standards from research in organizational psychology and cognitive sciences.
Our S.H.A.R.P.® framework is standardized and traceable
Our support approaches are based on the conceptual framework established by the ISO 22316 standard, Security and Resilience — Organizational Resilience and the WHO definition of psychosocial competencies (1993).
We measure our impact
All our interventions integrate ex-ante and ex-post measurement, to assess their behavioral impact.
Partido preis

Change enablment: Adaptability as a behavioral skill

See more
FAQS

UNREST in a nutshell

What is the cognitive and behavioral approach to change?
What is UNREST's value proposition?
How does UNREST differ from traditional leadership development?
What is the S.H.A.R.P.® model?
What sets UNREST apart from a consulting or coaching firm?