PSYCHOSOCIAL SKILLS DIAGNOSES

We scientifically measure your organization's capacity for change, by modeling the behavioral and relational skills of its members.

Only what can be measured can be controlled

Peter Drucker

Our methodology

Tailor-made interventions, based on research instruments.

We objectify the ability of leaders and organizations to deal with change and uncertainty, through psychometric tests of behavioral and relational skills.

Constat

Why assess?

The dominant evaluations in leadership development are based on two scientific impasses: personality trait tests, which measure stable undevelopable attitudes, and evaluations of vague constructs (“leadership”, “agility”) that aggregate heterogeneous dimensions without allowing targeted action.

A study published in April 2025 (Feraco et al.) has just confirmed this intuition: individuals believe more in their ability to develop skills than to change their personality. They find it more feasible, more motivating, more impacting. The result: generic profiles that label more than they equip, with no direct link to performance or the possibility of measuring real progress.

Approach

How do we do it

We rely on recent research in organizational psychology to assess specific, individual and collective constructs that have a high operational impact: agility, resilience, adaptive leadership, collective intelligence, collective intelligence, psychological security, etc.

Each construct is modelled in measurable dimensions using validated protocols. Where appropriate, we complement these instruments with a psychometric assessment of organizational constraints to model systemic barriers. This approach makes it possible to distinguish what relates to developable skills from what relates to structural obstacles that need to be overcome.

Deliverable

What we give you back

You get an operational map at two levels: the behavioral and relational skills that can be developed (with their measurable progression over time) and the organizational constraints to be neutralized in order to unleash performance.

Exit personality labels and fixed psychological profiles; make way for concrete levers of action, prioritized priorities and objective reevaluations. You are not profiling your talents according to what they “are”; you are identifying exactly what they can develop to maximize and measure their impact.

impact of programs

An impact validated by research in organizational psychology

A systematic review of 14 studies (Sarkar & Fletcher, 2015) shows that cognitive resilience programs significantly improve the mental well-being (d=0.78) and behavioral performance (d=1.0+) of employees.

Well-being

R² =
0.78

strong to very strong effects

Psychosocial variables

R² =
0.44
-
0.6

moderate to strong effects

Performance

R² =
1

very strong effects

R² = coefficient of determination
0.2 = weak 0.5 = medium 0.8+ = strong

Our difference

Why call on us?

UNREST is a cognitive-behavioral change firm. It is based on a resolutely scientific, structured and demanding approach to individual and collective change.

We only use research instruments
Our assessment and development solutions are entirely based on the latest tools and standards from research in organizational psychology and cognitive sciences.
Our S.H.A.R.P.® framework is standardized and traceable
Our support approaches are based on the conceptual framework established by the ISO 22316 standard, Security and Resilience — Organizational Resilience and the WHO definition of psychosocial competencies (1993).
We measure our impact
All our interventions integrate ex-ante and ex-post measurement, to assess their behavioral impact.
Partido preis

Change enablment: Adaptability as a behavioral skill

See more
FAQS

UNREST in a nutshell

What is the cognitive and behavioral approach to change?
What is UNREST's value proposition?
How does UNREST differ from traditional leadership development?
What is the S.H.A.R.P.® model?
What sets UNREST apart from a consulting or coaching firm?